Project 5W1H

Who, What, When, Where, Why, How. Context, not rage bait.

Question vs. Answer

Did Ottawa relabel $94 billion of expenses as investments? What the budget officer found

Project 5W1H

Since Budget 2025, Ottawa splits spending into "operating" and "capital investment" and aims to balance the operating side. A Sept. 25 Oral Question said this turned $94 billion of expenses into investments. The Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) did publish that number; it measures a gap between two definitions.

The exchange (Hansard, Sept. 25, 2026)

Question

Opposition MP Sandra Cobena (Newmarket—Aurora)

"…inventing financial definitions used nowhere else in the world. He relabelled $94 billion of expenses as investments. This is like calling a grocery bill an investment. The former PBO and the IMF called them out, and now the new PBO has gone even further by saying that these invented definitions are not even being applied consistently. Why is this Liberal government destroying the integrity of Canada's books?"

Answer

For the government, Wayne Long, Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

"…our plan is to spend less on government operations and prioritize investments that generate long-term benefits for Canadians, such as major projects, housing, clean energy and infrastructure that will help grow our economy and attract private investment. We have adopted a transparent capital budgeting framework that reflects the distinction between capital and operating spending so that Canadians can see clearly how public money is being invested."

Rating: Partly answered. It described the framework's purpose but did not address the PBO findings cited.

Does the framing hold up?

  • "$94 billion"

    Established with a narrower meaning. PBO's Nov. 14, 2025 review (interim PBO Jason Jacques) found capital investment "would total $217.3 billion over 2024-25 to 2029-30—approximately 30 per cent ($94 billion) lower compared to Budget 2025." It is a six-year gap between definitions, partly tax incentives (forgone revenue) that PBO said "would not be considered capital formation."

  • "Used nowhere else in the world"

    Claimed PBO says the scope "exceeds international practice such as that adopted by the United Kingdom." Budget 2025 cites the U.K. and Singapore as models.

  • "The former PBO and the IMF called them out"

    Established though IMF staff also called it "a welcome step."

  • "Not even being applied consistently"

    Established in substance. PBO's Sept. 24, 2026 report finds some classifications "appear contradictory by title alone": film tax credits count as capital, journalism tax credits don't.

  • "Destroying the integrity of Canada's books"

    Claimed PBO says the framework "does not replace" the accounting standards behind the Public Accounts.

  • The answer's "transparent"

    Claimed PBO credits new data but found "no formal methodology or a mapping framework have been published," so classifications can't be replicated.

The six questions

Who decides?
The federal government (Finance Canada), in the budget. 5W1H found no statute setting it.
What?
The Capital Budgeting Framework: "any government expenditures or tax incentives that contribute to public or private sector capital formation."
When?
Nov. 4, 2025; updated spring 2026.
Where?
Budget 2025, Annex 2.
Why?
To "identify and prioritize initiatives that deliver long-term economic returns."
How?
Capital items don't count against the operating balance, though such rules "do not limit overall government borrowing" (PBO).

Positions

  • Government: The Finance Minister's spokesperson told The Canadian Press that targeting operating spending is a "stricter guardrail" than debt-to-GDP.
  • PBO: Wants "an independent expert body" to decide what counts as capital.
  • Opposition MP: Wants the "original financial definitions" restored (follow-up).

Follow the Number

On PBO's definition, the operating budget stays in deficit through 2029-30. On the government's, PBO projects the 2028-29 target missed by a year, fixable with $500 million in restraint; the Prime Minister said Sept. 15 it is on track for 2027-28. PBO counts $126.8 billion of $173.3 billion in new measures since Budget 2025 as operating.

Established, claimed and unknown

  • EstablishedThe $94-billion gap; PBO and IMF concerns; Public Accounts unchanged.
  • Claimed"Relabelled," "nowhere else," "destroying integrity," "transparent," balance in 2027-28.
  • UnknownHow individual items are classified; whether Budget 2026 changes anything.

Repeated framing

openparliament.ca, an unofficial Hansard mirror, shows both lines repeated in the House from Nov. 17, 2025 to Sept. 25, 2026. Opposition MPs cited the $94-billion figure at least 17 times. Government-side MPs used "capital budgeting framework" at least seven times and "spend less on government operations" at least nine.

History

  • Oct. 7, 2025: PBO calls the scope "overly expansive."
  • Nov. 4: Budget 2025.
  • Nov. 14: the $94-billion finding.
  • Jan. 21, 2026: IMF review.
  • Sept. 24: PBO consistency report.

What could change it

The government could revise the definitions, publish a method or add independent checks, for example in Budget 2026. Parliament could legislate fiscal rules; 5W1H hasn't checked for such bills.

Sources

Primary sources first. News reports and mirrors are marked as secondary. A full source list with notes is kept alongside this piece.

Primary: the exchange

Primary: the framework and the $94 billion

Secondary

Researched and drafted with AI help; reviewed and approved by a person.

← Back to the front page · About our rules